As the collaborative unit begins, I’m still in the process of choosing my final direction. The course offers three possible pathways: Sound Design for Screen, Accessible Instrument Design, and an Independent Interdisciplinary Project. At this stage, my preferences are leaning toward the first path—Sound Design for Screen, followed by the Independent Interdisciplinary route, and finally, Accessible Instrument Design.
My strongest interest lies in sound design for games, particularly the creative and technical challenge of crafting audio that reacts to player behavior. While traditional sound design often involves placing static clips at key narrative moments, I’m more drawn to the dynamic and interactive potential of sound in games. This approach blends creativity with logic, and I’d like to explore how sound can evolve in real time, depending on gameplay states, player location, or interactions.
To support this, I see this project as an opportunity to expand my programming skills, especially in audio middleware or directly within game engines like Unity. Working beyond simple sample-based playback and into real-time systems could help me create more immersive and emotionally responsive experiences.
Although Sound Design for Screen is my current favorite, I’m also considering the Independent Interdisciplinary Project as a flexible alternative. If I manage to find a proper collaborator—perhaps one that connects sound design with narrative systems, interaction design, or installation—I may follow that route instead.
At the moment, Accessible Instrument Design is the least aligned with my personal interests and skill set, but I still appreciate its social value and may revisit it if an inspiring concept emerges.
Overall, Week 1 has been about reflection and strategic alignment—thinking carefully about how to match my passion for interactive sound with a meaningful and manageable project. In the coming week, I plan to test a few small prototypes and see which direction holds the most creative and technical potential.